A possible voluntary form
An ordinary nonprofit may be one path for public-interest work, subject to Albanian legal review and registration.
Bring experience, not endorsement
Good ideas get better when knowledgeable people test them.
Zana welcomes thoughtful questions from local groups, researchers, civil society, legal experts, and public institutions. A conversation does not imply support or partnership.
No endorsement impliedAlbanian law controlsIndependent review matters
For Collaborators & Reviewers
For Collaborators and Reviewers | Zana Trust
Questions and working boundaries for people who can help test the proposed Zana idea with care and independence.
A possible legal shape
A future stewardship body could support care and coordination. It could not become a private government.
Any legal shape would need Albanian counsel, clear accountability, and respect for property, planning, environmental, heritage, and public-law responsibilities.
Public decisions stay public
Municipal, national, cadastral, planning, environmental, heritage, and judicial powers remain with the lawful institutions that hold them.
Future projects stay separate
Any future proposal would need its own lawful owners, review, public process, and approvals. Zana would not make those decisions.
Questions worth testing
A useful reviewer can help make the unknowns smaller.
The idea should improve when someone identifies a gap, challenges an assumption, or explains why a path would not work.
Who decides?
Which public body owns each decision, consultation, approval, record, and enforcement path?
What must be protected?
Which water, landscape, biodiversity, heritage, archaeology, and UNESCO responsibilities apply?
Who owns and uses the land?
What is private, what is public, which rights exist, and how should access be understood?
Who is heard?
Who is affected, how can they participate, what could they influence, and where can they raise a concern?