Adopted record
UNESCO Decision 47 COM 7B.54 (2025) documents serious conservation concerns and requests further action.
Questions before proposals
The work is to understand the place, the people, and the legal responsibilities before anyone mistakes an idea for a project.
What We Are Exploring
Three early questions about care for Lake Ohrid, local voice, and a responsible legal shape for Zana.
Lake Ohrid, water, and access
Water quality, public access, heritage, and the character of the lakefront are not side issues. They are part of the starting point.
UNESCO Decision 47 COM 7B.54 (2025) documents serious conservation concerns and requests further action.
The 48th session ended on 29 July 2026. This site will not state a 2026 outcome until the adopted decision is published and verified.
Water conditions, public access, cumulative impacts, local priorities, and which independent expertise is needed.
Local voice and local benefit
A working participation concept asks how residents could see the evidence, question assumptions, raise concerns, and help define what benefit should mean locally.
Working concept; not adopted by an authority or formed organization.
Who should be heard, how participation could be fair, how dissent should be protected, and who would be accountable for follow-through.
Legal shape and responsibility
Early legal research considers whether a voluntary public-interest organization could support care and participation without claiming powers that belong to public authorities.
A Zana organization could not grant land, issue permits, approve plans, award public benefits, or take over public decisions.
Research package only—not legal advice, a bill, an approval, or proof of institutional support.
Official Albanian law and authoritative public records control. Comparative examples are only starting points for questions.